Stock LLM Wiki

報告_GS_國巨_20260705

更新 2026-07-06

PDF 原檔:報告_GS_國巨_20260705_original.pdf

原始內容

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Yageo Corp. (2327.TW)

Commodity MLCC pricing upcycle is coming, with more capacity transferred into AI industry; Buy, with new TP of NT$1,490 (from NT$346)

2327.TW

12m Pri c e Target:

NT$1,490.00

Pri c e:

NT$1,045.00

Upside:

42.6%

We are seeing a new trend of commodity MLCC pricing hikes emerging, and we believe Yageo is in a good position (~25% of the global commodity MLCC capacity share in 2026-28) to bene fi t from the solid commodity MLCC pricing hike outlook (we expect Yageo's commodity MLCC pricing to go up by 93%/84% in 2027/28E), leading to a 46%/51% GM in 2027E/28E and record high EPS.

Considering (1) more and more MLCC capacity is being transferred into the AI grade MLCC supply chain (we expect 14/24/32% of global MLCC capacity to support AI MLCC demand in 2026/27/28E, up from 9% in 2025), (2) the back-to-normal growth of non-AI MLCC demand (2025-28E volume CAGR at 9%, per GSe), and (3) inventory demand building up in coming years (inventory level in 2025 was 36% less than the peak level of the past ten years), we believe the global non-AI MLCC industry utilization rate will revert to 97%/100% in 2027/28E (vs. last peak of 94/99% in 2017/18), suggesting a solid pricing outlook for the overall MLCC market.

We raise our 2026/27/28E earnings by 11%/49%/106% to factor in the better pricing conditions for commodity MLCC as well as better order visibility. Re fl ecting this and rollover of our valuation base from 3Q26-2Q27 to 2H27-1H28 we revise up our 12-m TP to NT$1,490 (vs. NT$346 previously), with the target PB/ROE multiple at 26x (in line with past 20 years peak multiple). Overall, we are bullish on Yageo's traditional MLCC business pro fi tability, seeing a structural change in the industry supply demand conditions, suggesting good earnings outlook.

In this note, we transfer Yageo coverage from Daiki Takayama to Chao Wang.

BUY

Chao Wang

+886(2)2730-4195 | kuan-chao.wang@gs.com Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C., Taipei Branch

Allen Chang

+852-2978-2930 | allen.k.chang@gs.com Goldman Sachs (Asia) L.L.C.

Daiki Takayama

+81(3)4587-9870 | daiki.takayama@gs.com Goldman Sachs Japan Co., Ltd.

Key Data _____________________________________

Market cap: NT$2.1tr / $67.2bn

Enterprise value: NT$2.2tr / $68.6bn

3m ADTV: NT$33.2bn / $1.0bn

Taiwan

Taiwan Electronic Components

M&A Rank: 3

Leases incl. in net debt & EV?: No

GS Forecast 12/25 __________ 12/26E 196,764.5 12/27E 289,670.6 12/28E 388,444.8
Revenue(NT$mn) New Revenue (NT$ mn) Old 132,930.0 1 32,930.0 1 84,797.8 230,447.8 252,550.2
EBITD A (NT$ mn) 39,634.5 64, 1 39.7 1 07,325.3 1 58,305.3
EPS(NT$) New 11.51 21.22 37.56 57.32
EPS (NT$) Old 11 .5 1 1 9. 1 2 25.27 27.87
P/E (X) 1 3.4 49.3 27.8 1 8.2
P/B (X) 1 .9 11 .2 9.4 7.5
Dividend yield (%) 3.9 1 . 1 1 .9 2.9
CROCI (%) 9.5 1 3.6 2 1 .8 30.9
3/26 6/26E 9/26E 12/26E
EPS (NT$) 3.9 1 4.7 1 5.93 6.68
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_001

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Research estimates. See disclosures for details.

Goldman Sachs does and seeks to do business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the fi rm may have a con fl ict of interest that could a ff ect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in making their investment decision. For Reg AC certi fi cation and other important disclosures, see the Disclosure Appendix, or go to www.gs.com/research/hedge.html. Analysts employed by non-US a ffi liates are not registered/quali fi ed as research e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

BUY

Yageo Corp. (2327.TW) Rating since Jun 22, 2020

Ratios & Valuation __________________________________________

12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E
P/E (X) 13.4 49.3 27.8 18.2
P/B (X) 1.9 11.2 9.4 7.5
FCF yield (%) 7.8 1.6 2.6 4.4
EV/EBITD A R(X) 9.6 34.1 20.1 13.3
EV/EBITD A (excl. leases) (X) 9.6 34.1 20.1 13.3
CROCI (%) 9.5 13.6 21.8 30.9
ROE (%) 14.3 24.0 36.7 45.8
Net debt/eq u ity (%) 35.8 21.2 3.8 (16.2)
Net debt/eq u ity (excl. leases) (%) 35.8 21.2 3.8 (16.2)
I n te r est c ov e r (X) 10.4 17.7 31.7 48.4
Days i nv e n t or y ou tst , sales 81.6 59.2 47.3 44.9
Recei v able days 76.3 73.3 75.6 78.6
Days p ayable ou tsta n di ng 71.1 63.6 62.2 64.5
D u P on t ROE (%) 13.6 22.3 33.2 40.8
T urnov e r (X) 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7
L e v e r a g e (X) 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0
Gro ss cas h i nv ested (ex cas h ) (NT $ ) 367 , 675.4 378 , 066.1 393 , 402.5 405 , 759.7
Av e r a g e ca p ital e mp l o yed (NT $ ) 232 , 763.5 236 , 363.4 238 , 536.9 241 , 244.5
BVP S (NT $ ) 83.22 93.40 111.38 138.82

Growth & Margins (%) ______________________________________

12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E
Total revenue growth 9.3 48 47.2 34.1
EBITDA growth 20.1 61.8 67.3 47.5
EPS growth (69.8) 84.3 77 52.6
DPS growth (70.0) 84.3 77 52.6
EBIT margin 22.4 27.3 33.3 37.8
EBITDA margin 29.8 32.6 37.1 40.8
Net income margin 17.8 22.1 26.6 30.3

Price Performance __________________________________________

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_002
3m 6m 1 2m
Absolute 324.8% 333.6% 736.8%
Rel. to the TaiwanSE Weighted Index 195.8% 172.0% 306.3%

Source: FactSet. Price as of 3 Jul 2026 close.

Income Statement (NT$ mn) ________________________________

12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E
Tota l r e v e nu e 13 2 ,930.0 196,764.5 2 89,670.6 388,444.8
Cost of goods sold (84,800. 2 ) (117,44 2 .3) (156,769.5) (19 2 ,349.6)
SG&A (14,910.4) -- -- --
R&D (3,418.7) 0.0 0.0 0.0
Other operating inc./(exp.) 0.0 ( 2 5,587.4) (36,551.0) 1 (49,093. 2 )
E BITDA Depreciation& amortization 39, 6 34. 5 6 4, 1 39. 7 (10,404.9) 0 7 ,3 25 .3 (10,975.3) 158 ,30 5 .3 (11,303.1)
E BIT (9,833.8) 2 9, 8 00. 7 5 3, 7 34. 8 9 6 ,3 5 0.0 1 4 7 ,00 2 . 1
Net interest inc./(exp.) 1,570.7 2 ,878.9 4,403.6 6,776.4
Income/(loss) from associates 0.0 1,013.8 74 2 .7 2 79.6
Pre-tax pro fi t 3 1 , 11 9. 7 56 , 126 . 6 9 8 ,4 7 0. 8 1 4 8 , 65 9. 7
Provision for taxes (7,34 2 .8) (1 2 ,447.4) ( 2 1, 2 55.9) (30,869.1)
Minority interest (14 2 .6) (1 2 6.7) (1 2 0.0) (1 2 0.0)
Preferred dividends N et inc . ( pre-ex c ept i ls) -- -- --
o n a Post-tax exceptionals N et inc . ( po s t-ex c ept i o 2 3, 6 34. 2 -- 2 3, 6 34. 2 43, 552 . 5 -- 43, 552 . 5 77 ,094.9 -- 77 ,094.9 -- 117 , 67 0. 6 -- 117 , 67 0. 6
n a ls) E P S(b a sic , pre-ex c ept ) (N T $) E P S(dilu te d , pre-ex c ept ) (N T E P S(b a sic , po s t-ex c ept ) (N T 11 . 51 11 . 11 . ______ 11.06 5 2 .1 12/26E 3 7 . 56 3 7 . 56 19.58 5 2 .1 57 .3 2 57 .3 2 57 .3 2
$) $) 11 . 51 51 21 . 22 21 . 22 21 . 22 21 . 22 3 7 . 56 3 7 . 56 57 .3 2
E P S(dilu te d , po s t-ex c ept ) (N T $) 51 6.00 2
DPS (NT$) 5 2 .1 9.88 5 2 .1
Div. payout ratio
(%)
Balance Sheet (NT$ mn) 12/25 81,473.5 102,463.7 12/27E 135,129.1 12/28E 190,526.0 95,780.9
C a sh& c a sh equiv a lents Accounts receiv a ble Inventory 30,509.6 31,635.6 48,517.3 32,176.0 71,425.6 42,950.6 52,698.5
Other current a ssets 21,727.1 21,727.1 21,727.1 21,727.1
Total current assets 165 , 3 4 5 . 8 20 4, 88 4. 1 271 , 232 . 5 360 , 732 . 6
Net PP&E 65,304.8 58,044.0 53,800.6
Net int a ngibles 106,699.8 61,959.6 105,696.2 104,692.5 103,688.8
Tot a l investments Other long-term a 45,202.5 8,236.2 46,216.3 8,236.2 46,959.0 8,236.2 47,238.6
ssets 8,236.2
Total assets 3 9 0 , 78 9. 2 4 26 ,99 2 .4 4 8 9, 16 4. 2 573 , 6 9 6 . 8
Accounts p a y a ble Short-term debt 18,031.4 86,258.7 22,875.5 86,258.7 30,535.7
-- -- 86,258.7 -- 37,466.0 86,258.7 --
Short-term le a se li a bilities Other current li a bilities liabilities 31,789.3 136 , 07 9.4 42,172.3 151 , 306 . 5 59,657.4 176 ,4 51 . 8 57,588.8 80,808.9 20 4, 533 . 6 57,588.8
Total current Long-term debt 57,588.8
Long-term le a se li a bilities 57,588.8 -- -- -- 23,124.5 -- 23,124.5
Other long-term li a bilities Total long-term liabilities 23,124.5 80 , 713 . 216 , 7 9 2 . 23,124.5 80 , 713 . 2 232 , 01 9. 8 80 , 713 . 257 , 165 . 80 , 713 . 285 , 2 4 6 .
Total liabilities 2 6 2 0 2 8
Preferred sh a res -- -- -- --
Tot a l commonequity Minority interest 170,877.8 3 , 118 . 7 191,727.1 3 , 2 4 5 .4 228,633.7 3 , 365 .4 284,964.6 3 ,4 85 .4 573 , 6 9 6 . 8
Total liabilities &equity 3 9 0 , 78 9. 2 62,374.0 4 26 ,99 2 .4 4 8 9, 16 4. 2 8,718.3
Net debt, a djusted
mn)
41,383.8
Cash Flow (NT$ 12/25 12/26E 12/27E __________ (46,678.5) 12/28E
Net income D&Aadd-back 23,634 . 2 9,833 . 8 142 . 6 (5,002 . 1) 43,552 . 5 10,404 . 9 126 . 7 (13,704 . 0) 77,094 . 9 10,975 . 3 120 . 0 (26,022 . 7) 117,670 . 6 11,303 . 1 120 . 0 . 9)
Minority interest add-back Net (inc)/dec working Other operating cash flow 2,254 . 6 30, 86 3. 1 (1,013 . 8) 39,3 66 .4 (742 . 7) 61 ,4 2 4. (27,172 (279 . 6) 1 0 1 , 6 4 1 . 2
capital Cash flow fro m
operations
7 (6,056 . 0)
Capital expenditures Acquisitions (6,056 . 0) 21,996 . (6,056 . 0) -- (6,056 . 0) -- --
Divestitures 0 1,344 . 3 -- -- --
Others Cash flow fro m . 6) --
investing (21,009 (3, 725 .3) -- ( 56 .0) -- ,0 56 .0) ( 6 56 .0)
Repayment of lease liabilities -- ( 6 ,0 --
6 ,0 -- . 3)
Dividends paid(common& pref) -- (10,265 . 2) (12,320 . 1) (22,703 . 2) (40,188 --
Inc/(dec) in debt Other financing cash flows 89,213 . 2 (85,730 . 0) ( 6 , 782 .0) -- 0 . 0 ) -- 0 . 0 ) 0 . 0 188 .3)
Cash flow fro m financing Total cash flow 2 0,3 55 .9 ( 12 ,3 2 0. 1 2 0,990. 2 ( 22 , 7 03. 2 3 2 , 665 .4 (40, 55 ,39 6 .9
1
55,368 . 7
33,310 . 95,585 . 2
Free cash flow 24,807 . 3

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Research estimates.

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

cxmble l Major Mecup cycles, down cycles Ill last two deldues

60%

50%

40%

30%

20%

10%

0%

-10%

-20%

OPM

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

excess inventory

Jan-99

  • Yageo

Notebook, color feature phone

of

Smartphone boom

Yen appre-

MLCC industry analysis - Commodity MLCC should see a much better pricing outlook, as suppliers are all transferring commodity capacity into AI grade capacity inventories

(2004-2006)

(auto, loT, new

Consumer electornics

growth driven by

We believe the next upcycle for the MLCC industry will be driven by AI, in order to meet with the strong AI demand, and major JP/KR MLCC suppliers continuing to shift capacity towards AI applications, which should tighten commodity MLCC supply and lead to full utilization and a more favorable pricing environment. We expect the pricing hike ratio for commodity products to surpass the high-end due to their lower margin and diverse customer base, o ff ering more room for price increases.

AI will be a key driver for global MLCC TAM

We expect global MLCC TAM to reach 33% CAGR over 2025-28E, with AI MLCC TAM tracking faster at 93% CAGR and reaching 19% of total global MLCC TAM in 2028E (from 6% in 2025). The strong demand for AI MLCC should be supported by both higher server shipment volumes and a signi fi cant increase in MLCC content per server (we expect MLCC to reach 300K+/500K+ for GB300/VR200 vs. 12k for general server).

Exhibit 1: Major MLCC up cycles / down cycles in last two decades

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_003

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

GFC

Restocking

S/D tightening e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Exhibit 2: AI to drive MLCC TAM expansion through 2025-28E

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_004

Exhibit 3: Smartphone and automotive continues to drive non-AI MLCC demand

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_005

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Company data

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Company data

Non-AI MLCC remains a stable market

We expect non-AI MLCC volume to see a stable CAGR of 9% in 2025-28E, continuing to be supported by both automotive and smartphone, with CAGR of 8%/7% in 2025-28E, respectively. We view the automotive MLCC segment as a key sector as it accounts for 20%+ of total non-AI MLCC through 2025-28E, with the level of MLCC consumption to be notably higher than other non-AI segments (e.g. 20k+ on average vs. ~2K for smartphones and ~2.5K on average for desktop PCs). Smartphone accounts for 25%+ of total non-AI MLCC through 2025-28E, with shipments continuing to be impacted by high memory costs (see here), while the content-per-box increase has largely o ff set the negative impact. We also expect segments such as PCs and servers continuing to see content-per-box increases.

Exhibit 4: MLCC content per device (including power) comparison

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_006

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_007

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Company data

Major suppliers shifting capacity toward AI application to meet the strong demand

We believe annual capacity for the MLCC industry will see a stable increase of around 10% per year through 2026-28E, while the capacity expansion plans for major MLCC suppliers will outpace the market with double digit YoY expansion. Other than the stable capacity expansion, we continue to see major JP/KR suppliers continuing to shift capacity toward AI applications in order to meet the strong AI demand. Also, major MLCC suppliers are prioritizing AI-related orders due to their better margin pro fi les, e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

LULI TUT

120%

Non-Al capacity (bn units/ month)

Yageo

Non-Al supply growth rate

Non-Al demand growth rate

100%

Theoretic al UTR

Acutal UTR

Inventory build / access demand

Inventory volume (bn units)

80%

60%

40%

20%

0%

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

E-glass

2018

45

413

13%

2019

54

460

11%

2020

58

513

12%

2021

62

593

15%

2022

62

668

13%

2023

71

720

8%

2024

80

762

6%

2025

80

786

3%

2026E

80

798

1%

2027E

0%

2028E

0%

which may mean they will start considering taking on more orders from non-AI segments. 74% (684) 81% (432) 71% (545) 62% (719) 70% 45 75% 338 82% 714 97% 1,449 100% 876

Commodity MLCC to see price hikes driven by the tightened supply 474

571

The industry shift in capacity expansion toward AI is also constructive for the commodity MLCC segment, as the segment is more sensitive to supply demand conditions. More capacity dedicated to AI MLCCs e ff ectively tightens the supply available for commodity MLCCs, and we forecast the global non-AI MLCC industry utilization rate to revert to 97%/100% in 2027/28E, similar to the level of last peak of 94/99% in 2017/18. This creates a more favorable pricing environment for commodity MLCCs. Given that AI MLCC already enjoy higher margins and are mainly focused on bigger customers with contracts, its relatively di ffi cult for them to adopt aggressive pricing adjustments, and we believe commodity product pricing hike ratios are likely to surpass the high-end MLCC products (Exhibit 7).

Low-DK/

DK 2 glass

2017

37

367

8%

11%

92%

94%

108

108

Spot price

Exhibit 6: Non-AI MLCC industry utilization rate to be to 97/100% in 2027/28E

Source: Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Company data

Exhibit 7: We expect low-end product pricing hike ratio to surpass high-end, due to the capacity transformation into high-end driven by AI technology migration demand 2027 YoY

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_008

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Yageo is in a good position to bene fi t from the solid commodity MLCC pricing hike

As mentioned above, we do expect the commodity MLCC product pricing to rise much faster than the industry MLCC pricing hike level, which should bene fi t Yageo the most in the overall MLCC supply chain, as its commodity MLCC accounts for more than 72%/85% of its total MLCC revenue in 2026/27 (vs. all other JP/KR players, which are all focusing on high-end / AI grade MLCC) with a 23% capacity share in the commodity MLCC market in 2026 (the single largest commodity MLCC capacity holder, while the second largest supplier's capacity only holds 15% of the industry capacity; Exhibit 10).

Yageo to bene fi t the most from the commodity MLCC pricing hike; we expect the company to enjoy a 29/93/84% YoY pricing upside in 2026/27/28E

For Yageo's MLCC business, only ~10% is related to the AI server industry today, which mostly is not covered by LTA or any agreement and is covered by distributors; moreover, ~72%/85/90% of the MLCC revenue will be contributed by commodity business in 2026/27/28, or 23/32/40% of the company's overall GP in 2026/27/28, based on GSe (vs. 20% in the past 5 years; Exhibit 8).

We now expect Yageo's commodity MLCC pricing to go up by 29%/93%/84% YoY in 2026/27/28E vs. -5%~+10% YoY in 2022-25 (Exhibit 9), which was not only driven by the company leadership position in the commodity MLCC market, but also its high capacity share and good relationship with distributors, making the company able to control its utilization rate and industry inventory levels to help with pricing hike progress.

On the margin side, as we see no signi fi cant cost hike from key components; we believe the commodity MLCC pricing hike from 2H26 should directly improve the company's overall pro fi tability and absolute pro fi t level in coming years, which should boost the company's overall OPM from the last trough level at 19% in 2023 or 22% in 2025 directly to 27.3%/33.3%/37.8% in 2026/27/28E (Exhibit 11). We believe the OPM expansion speed this time will be more sustainable than in 2017-18 (this time we believe the pricing uptrend period should last for at least 30 months if AI demand doesn't slow down in the next 30 months), thanks to the expanding demand from AI, and key high-end suppliers' focus on expanding high capacity MLCC, allowing the second tier players like Yageo to bene fi t from the pricing/margin tailwind in coming years.

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

maustry Capacity In 4uzo

70,000

60,000

50,000

40,000

30,000

20,000

10,000

. . .

80%

70%

60%

Tageus Mece pricmo rot trenu

120%

100%

80%

60%

Others, 3%

сстС,

Exhibit 8: Commodity MLCC will contribute 23/32/40% of total Yageo OPI in 2026/27/28E, up from 20% in the past 5 years 50% 30% 0%

10%

Weirong, 15%

20%

Walsin, 15%

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_009

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Exhibit 10: Yageo holds 23% of the commodity MLCC industry capacity in 2026

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_010

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Exhibit 9: We expect Yageo's MLCC pricing YoY will start to accelerate from 2H26 and continue in the next 24-30 months

Yageo's MLCC pricing YoY trend

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_011

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Exhibit 11: Yageo's commodity MLCC ASP trend vs. OPM

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_012

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Yageo should start outperforming JP/KR peers in revenue/margin growth outlook, thanks to the commodity MLCC pricing hike

Like what we have seen in the past two cycles in the past 10 years, we believe Yageo will again start to outperform the high-end peers in JP/KR in coming years, due mainly to the much better than expected commodity pricing outlook (while we expect the high-end players' ASP to only grow by ~50% CAGR in next 3 years). We forecast Yageo's commodity MLCC pricing will grow by ~70% 2025-28E CAGR, which suggests Yageo's growth/margin growth premium vs. JP/KR peers will be in-line with the past 10-year upcycle period.

We expect Yageo's overall revenue to grow by 43% 2025-28E CAGR, with the OPM to expand by 15ppt from 2025 (22.4%) to 2028 (37.8%), while expecting the other JP/KR high-end players together to only enjoy a 14% 2025-28E revenue CAGR with the OPM only increasing from 10.0% in 2025 to 20.4% in 2028E.

-20%

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

Clanks to the better prichs outlook a much better prichs outlook

140%

60%

50%

120%

40%

100%

30%

80%

20%

60%

10%

0%

40%

OPM

2016

20%

0%

-20%

-40%

-60%

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

2017

2018

— Yageo

F3/16

2019

2020

2021

—Murata

F3/18

• Yageo

F3/19

Exhibit 12: We believe Yageo will enjoy much better revenue growth than others from 2H26, thanks to the better pricing outlook

2022

2023

-Taiyo Yuden

F3/201

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_013

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_014

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Earnings revision: Revising up 2026-28E EPS by 11-106% to factor in the better MLCC pricing outlook

Earnings revisions

We revise up our 2026/27/28E EPS by 11/49/106% to factor in better pricing conditions for commodity MLCC as well as better order visibility (we revise up 2026/27/28E revenue estimates by 6/26/54%). We expect the contribution to be margin accretive thus we revise up our 2026/27/28E GM by 0.9/4.7/8.9ppt.

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

camble 19 camos revision lavie

Exmole 1. bur nanbers vo. Dioomuers consellsus

Yageo P&L (NTS mn)

Sales

Gross Profit

Revenue

EBIT

2026E New 2026E Old

2026E

196,765

184,798

Consensus

Diff (%)

196,765

79,322

53,735

166,358

Exhibit 14: Earnings revision table

Operating profits

Net earnings

Ratio analysis

Gross margin

EBIT margin

EPS, NT$

Net margin

Gross margin (%)

EBIT margin (%)

Net margin (%)

72,789

48,333

Diff.

6%

9%

2027E New 2027E Old

2027E

289,671

230,448

132,901

GS est,

Consensus

Diff.

26%

40%

Diff (%)

289,671

11%

18%

39,255

11%

11%

96,350

219,069

132,901

77.095

94,832

65,206

51,867

2028E New

2028E

388,445

196,095

GS est,

32%

48%

147,002

388.445

49%

43%

25.27

196,095

49%

117,671

57.32

2028E Old

72,825

267.065

57,208

123,187

27.87

Diff.

45%

102%

59%

106%

www

22%

93,094

37.56

53,735 43,591 23% 96,350 68,675 40% 147,002 92,021 60%
43,553 40.3% 39.4% 35,291 0.9pp 23% 77,095 45.9% 41.2% 54,777 4.7pp 41% 117,671 50.5% 41.6% 75,232 8.9p.p 56%
21.22 27.3% 26.2% 17.16 1.2pp 24% 37.56 33.3% 28.3% 26.98 5.0pp 39% 37.8% 57.32 28.8% 36.53 9.0pp 57%
40.3% 22.1% 21.2% 39.0% 0.9pp 45.9% 26.6% 22.5% 42.5% 4.1pp 30.3% 50.5% 22.7% 46.1% 7.6pp
26.2% 1.3ppt 3.4ppt 4.4ppt
27.3% 1.1ppt 33.3% 31.3% 1.9ppt 37.8% 34.5% 3.4ppt
21.2% 0.9ppt 26.6% 25.0% 1.6ppt 30.3% 28.2% 2.1ppt

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Where are we vs. consensus?

Our 2026/27/28E revenue estimates are 18/32/45% higher than Bloomberg consensus, due to our positive view on the better pricing for commodity MLCC, which we expect to increase 15-20% in each quarter throughout 2027/28 (BBG consensus only implies ~10% per quarter pricing hike). As such, considering the better operating leverage driven by price hikes, our 2026/27/28E GM estimate is 1.3/3.4/4.4ppt higher than Bloomberg consensus, as we believe the company's revenue will be mainly driven by MLCC in the coming years (35%/45%/53% revenue contribution in 2026/27/28E).

Exhibit 15: Our numbers vs. Bloomberg consensus

Source: Bloomberg, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

106%

19.12

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

NTSmn

Revenue

Gross profit

Operating expense

Operating income

Pretax income

Taxes expense

Net income

1Q25

(4,623)

6,463

2Q25

(4,609)

7,044

3Q25

33,087

11.974

(4,412)

7,562

7,173

8,212

7,028

Exhibit 16: P&L table

EPS, NTS

Ratio analysis and assumption

As % of sales

Gross margin

Operating expense ratio

Operating margin

Net margin

QoQ growth (%)

2Q26E

44,653

17,844

(5,983)

11,861

12,431

(2,739)

9,662

4025

35,968

13.417

(4,664)

8,753

8,727

(1,904)

6,768

1Q27E

62,822

27,254

(7,906)

19,349

19,869

(4,383)

15,456

4Q26E

58,666

24,483

(7,417)

17,066

17,656

(3,928)

13,698

3Q26E

55,280

22,453

(7,291)

15,163

15,683

(3,487)

12,165

2Q27E

69,318

31,363

(8,831)

22,532

23,102

(5,032)

18,040

3Q27E

76,935

35,746

(9,605)

26,141

26,661

(5,703)

20,928

4Q27E

80,596

38,537

(10,209)

28,328

28,839

(6,138)

22,671

2024

121,667

41,803

(18,377)

23,427

26,906

(7,376)

19,398

2025

132,930

48,130

(18,307)

29,822

31,140

(7,346)

23,652

2026E

196,765

79,322

(25,587)

53,735

56,127

(12,447)

43,553

2027E

289.671

(36,551)

96,350

98,471

(21,256)

77,095

2028E

388,445

(49,093)

147,002

148,660

(30,869)

117,671

2.69 2.43 3.10 3.30 4.71 5.93 6.68 7.53 8.79 10.20 11.05 9.50 11.52 21.22 37.56 57.32
35.6% 35.6% 36.2% 37.3% 38.1% 40.0% 40.6% 41.7% 43.4% 45.2% 46.5% 47.8% 34.4% 36.2% 40.3% 45.9% 50.5%
14.9% 14.1% 13.3% 13.0% 12.8% 13.4% 13.2% 12.6% 12.6% 12.7% 12.5% 12.7% 15.1% 13.8% 13.0% 12.6% 12.6%
20.8% 21.5% 22.9% 24.3% 25.3% 26.6% 27.4% 29.1% 30.8% 32.5% 34.0% 35.1% 19.3% 22.4% 27.3% 33.3% 37.8%
17.8% 15.3% 19.2% 18.8% 21.0% 21.6% 22.0% 23.3% 24.6% 26.0% 27.2% 28.1% 15.9% 17.8% 22.1% 26.6% 30.3%

Revenue

Gross profit

Operating income

Net income

YoY growth (%)

Revenue

Gross profit

Operating income

Net income

5.4%

7.1%

6.1%

1.0%

10.3%

11.0%

4.8%

11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8% 11.4% 5.1% 2.8% 12.1% 8.4% 22.7% 25.8% 9.0% 11.3% 15.1% 14.0% 7.8%
20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4% 20.5% 9.0% 7.4% 15.8% 10.2% 23.0% 27.8% 12.6% 13.4% 16.5% 16.0% 8.4%
49.1% -9.6% 27.2% 6.5% 18.6% 20.4% 25.9% 12.6% 12.8% 16.7% 16.0% 8.3%
9.1% 4.3% 4.3% 19.9% 22.7% 36.3% 67.1% 63.1% 64.6% 55.2% 39.2% 37.4% 13% 9% 48% 47% 34%
15.1% 5.6% 7.1% 34.8% 31.2% 53.1% 87.5% 82 5% 87.4% 75.8% 59.2% 57.4% 16% 15% 65% 68% 48%
30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53% 30.8% 8.7% 14.0% 63.1% 49.2% 68.4% 100.5% 95.0% 100.6% 90.0% 72 4% 66.0% 14% 27% 80% 79% 53%
20.5% -8.3% 12.5% 82.5% 45.2% 93.3% 91.4% 102.4% 92.6% 86.7% 72.0% 65.5% 11% 22% 84% 77% 53%

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Valuation and risks - Raise TP to NT$1,490 with much better pricing visibility and sustainability

We reiterate our Buy rating on Yageo with a new TP of NT$1,490 (from NT$346), implying 43% upside. We believe the company will continue to deliver a solid earnings growth rate (83%+ 2025-28E EPS CAGR) which is much faster than MLCC industry peers (45% CAGR 2025-28).

Our 12-month target price is based on a higher 26x PB/ROE (up from 15x previously), and we roll over our valuation base from 2H26-1H27E to 2028E to factor in the long visibility of the pricing upcycle this time (we expect demand will continue to be driven by the AI server related demand in at least the next 2.5-3 years). The 26x PB/ROE multiple is in line with the past 10-year peak multiple (Exhibit 17), and is in-line with the JP/KR MLCC suppliers' P/E multiples today, despite Yageo's fast earnings growth (Exhibit 19).

Our TP-implied 10.8x 2028E P/B is much higher than the company's average P/B multiple in the past (Exhibit 18); however, after considering the high ROE (increasing to 23%/36%/41% in 2026/27/28E based on GSe), we believe this higher implied multiple is justi fi ed as the company should be traded at a premium considering our forecast of its accelerating expansion in ROE in coming years.

Overall, considering the company's ongoing earnings expansion trend and the solid pricing outlook as well as the long S/D visibility (to end of 2028), we maintain our positive view on Yageo's fundamentals and stock price upside, and see a good opportunity for a valuation rerating if the company can continue to deliver good earnings performance. Reiterate our Buy rating on Yageo, with a new TP of NT$1,490.

3.7%

23.8%

8.7%

17.0%

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

6.1%

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

I-m lor wara rD nor trend mthe past lu yedis

I comms quarters

50x

35

40x

30

30x

25

20x

20

10x

15

Ox

10

5%

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Yaxis: 20252 PEERS CAR (%)

Our TP Implied PE vs. • Taiyo Yuder

EPS CAGR

Exhibit 17: Yageo's avg PB/ROE multiple in the past 10-years is at 11x, but peak multiple was 26x 12-m forward PB/ROE trend in the past 10 years

Jan-17

deliver a sond nor outlook a coms years

12

10

8

6

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_015

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Exhibit 19: We expect accelerating EPS growth for Yageo in coming years, suggesting a potential rerating opportunity in coming quarters

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_016

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Investment thesis and Valuation & Risks

Yageo, as the third largest MLCC and largest resistor / tantalum capacitor supplier globally, should see a stronger then peers earnings growth in the future, underpinned by better pricing environment, product upgrade, expansion strategy and more diversi fi ed product portfolio given the recent Kemet, Chilisin and Shibaura acquisitions. Yageo continues to penetrate into the high-end MLCC market (especially automotive/EV, industrial and high-end computing), which has a better S/D outlook compared to the commoditized market. Also, high-end MLCC market demand visibility is much clearer, with a more stable pricing trend, which suggests a less volatile earnings outlook. Yageo has started to bene fi t from an improving pricing environment for low-end MLCCs, driven by tightening supply. We hold a positive view on Yageo, given it is the supplier with the broadest product portfolio, which should help the company increase its market share by cross-selling and up-selling. Valuation o ff ers attractive risk-reward with shares trading below historical multiples. Key downside risks: (1) weaker inventory builds from OEMs; (2) softer IT end-demand; and (3) slower-than-expected integration of

X axis: 2027/28E Avg ROE (%

Yageo

Exhibit 18: The solid ROE uptrend suggests a much higher P/B multiple in the coming years

• SEMCO

• Murata

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_017

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Exhibit 20: The high P/B is slightly below industry linear regression (vs. ROE), and we expect the company will deliver a solid ROE outlook in coming years

2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_018

Source: Company data, Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research

Jan-16

Jul-16

Y axis: 2028E PB (x e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

Kemet/Chilisin/Telemecanique/Shibaura.

Our 12m TP of NT$1,490 is based on a 26x average 2028E PB/ROE (in-line with the peak valuation historically and is in-line with JP peers' average 2027/28E PB/ROE). Key downside risks: (1) weaker inventory builds from OEMs; (2) softer IT end-demand; and (3) slower-than-expected integration of Kemet/Chilisin/Telemecanique/Shibaura.

e92c7a75ab8b4efbba794e6b187208c8

For the exclusive use of KEVINLU@LENOVO.COM

圖片清單(已驗證 2026-07-06)

檔名 大小 分類 內容摘要
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_003.png 270KB 真資料圖 MLCC 產業 OPM 趨勢,國巨 vs Murata/Taiyo Yuden/TDK/SEMCO/Walsin,Jan-99 至 Jan-29,標示主要漲跌循環
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_005.png 40KB 真資料圖 非 AI MLCC 需求,按終端市場(手機/行動IoT/一般伺服器/車用/消費/工業)拆分,2012-2028E,長條+YoY 線
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_009.png 56KB 真資料圖 國巨 Commodity MLCC 營業利益(NT$mn,長條)及佔總 OPI % 趨勢,2016-2028E;2028E commodity 佔比升至 ~40%
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_013.png 98KB 真資料圖 國巨 vs Japan combined vs SEMCO 營收成長率比較,F3/16–F3/29,附國巨 growth premium 折線
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_014.png 74KB 真資料圖 國巨 OPM vs Murata/Taiyo Yuden/SEMCO 走勢,2016-2028E,顯示國巨持續拉開差距
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_015.png 81KB 真資料圖 12M Fwd P/E 歷史走勢 Jan-16 至 Jul-26;平均 11.2x,+1SD 16.5x,+2SD 21.9x,-1SD 5.8x
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_017.png 44KB 真資料圖 12M Fwd PB vs ROE 折線,Jan-20 至 Jul-26;current ROE 36.9%,PB ~3x
2026-07-05 260705_gs_yageo_019.png 75KB 裝飾 GS 評等與目標價歷史圖(券商標準揭露用)