Stock LLM Wiki

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727

更新 2026-07-27

PDF 原檔:報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_original.pdf

圖片清單(已驗證 2026-07-27)

範圍性驗證:逐張 Read 內容價值最高的 4 張(002 / 007 / 008 / 012)。其餘 17 張未逐張 Read(依報告 Figure 標題多為 PE band、上下檔情境、營收組合圓餅與產品照),未嵌入。

檔名 size 分類 親眼所見內容
報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_002.png 44KB 真資料圖 柱狀圖,橫軸 Q123→Q427E,縱軸 kwpm 0-190。深棕柱為 TSMC CoWoS capacity,自 Q123 約 10kwpm 升至 Q426E 約 135、Q427E 約 180;淺色柱為 Non-TSMC CoWoS capacity,Q325 起明顯放大,Q427E 約 70
報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_007.png 32KB 真資料圖 堆疊柱狀圖,橫軸 2024→2028E,縱軸 NT$m 0-25,000。分色為 CoWoS / CoPoS / CPO / SoIC / Flip chip & others。2026E 總額約 9,000 幾乎全為 CoWoS;2027E 約 14,000(CoWoS 約 10,500+CPO 約 2,000+CoPoS 少量);2028E 約 23,500,其中 CoPoS(淺棕)躍居最大約 10,000、CoWoS 降至約 7,000、CPO 約 5,500
報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_008.png 163KB 真資料圖 NVIDIA CPO 封裝配置示意圖:中央 Switch ASIC Chip,四周排列 OE 模組。右側四個標註框指出各環節供應商——Switch chip CoW:TSMC;OE stacking service:TSMC、OE stacking equipment:BESI、OE on substrate packaging:ASE/SPIL;FAU coupling service:ASE/SPIL、FAU coupling equipment:All Ring(紅框標示)
報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_012.png 175KB 真資料圖 設備實照:機台取放頭(雙夾爪與噴嘴)位於輸送軌道上方,軌道上排列多個金屬散熱片/載具工件——對應報告 Figure 12「Heatsink placement tool」

原始內容

Initiation of Coverage

All Ring Tech

Share gainer in expanding advanced packaging TAM

Major beneficiary of rising advanced packaging investment

We initiate coverage of All Ring with a Buy rating and a price target of NT$1,550, implying 65% upside. All Ring is a well established automation and equipment supplier for the semiconductor back end, providing underfill, heatsink attach and automated optical inspection (AOI) tools for TSMC and ASE's CoWoS packaging. We are optimistic about the sustained capex cycle of advanced packaging in the next two to three years, backed by strong cloud AI demand and the emerging co-packaged optics (CPO) opportunity. The stock has pulled back 32% from its previous peak in April 2026 due to broader market deleveraging, concerns about hyperscaler capex and an expectation reset for the CPO ramp. At 15x 2027-28E PE, the stock presents attractive risk-reward, considering a 35% earnings CAGR in 2027-30E.

Accelerated industry expansion of advanced packaging and tech upgrade

Advanced packaging plays a critical role in supporting cloud AI chips for greater compute performance and high-speed interconnect between compute and memory at lower power. We believe TSMC and ASE will accelerate CoWoS expansion in 2027E. Industry capex could trend up further in 2028-29E, driven by CoPoS, SoIC, and other technologies in Taiwan, the US, and Southeast Asia. New technologies such as CoPoS could lift All Ring's tool ASP by 15% or more, given upgraded capability and throughput. All Ring may also expand its share in CoPoS through improved execution and TSMC's localization. We forecast All Ring's SEMI sales to grow 78%/53%/70% in 2026/2027/2028.

CPO to be a new driver in 2027E and beyond

All Ring is also well positioned in CPO, a new optical interconnect solution with high bandwidth and reasonable power consumption for next-generation AI servers (see our CPO deep dive). All Ring's major opportunity in 2027-28E could be in fiber array unit (FAU) coupling with optical engine (OE). We believe All Ring may be leading its major competitor in terms of tool throughput and performance. We forecast CPO to contribute 13%/23% of sales in 2027/2028.

Valuation: Initiate with a Buy rating and a price target of NT$1,550

We forecast 2026/2027/2028 EPS of NT$28.03/NT$45.06/NT$78.81, with our 2028E EPS 18% ahead of consensus. Our price target of NT$1,550 is based on 25x average 2027-28E PE. We believe PE close to the high end of its historical range is justified, considering: 1) a 35% long-term earnings CAGR; 2) the cloud AI mega-trend driving structural advanced packaging investment; and 3) All Ring's strengthening industry position and share expansion. We initiate with a Buy rating.

Highlights (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Revenues 1,205 5,535 5,366 9,351 14,194 23,937 28,031 31,166
EBIT (UBS) 85 1,427 1,611 3,277 5,394 9,455 11,493 13,402
Net earnings (UBS) 138 1,311 1,485 2,699 4,339 7,589 9,219 10,790
EPS (UBS, diluted) (NT$) 1.59 14.57 15.26 27.71 44.54 77.90 94.63 110.77
DPS (net) (NT$) 1.61 10.90 10.80 19.62 31.54 55.16 67.01 78.43
Net (debt) / cash 287 3,309 3,947 4,198 3,959 1,919 13,997 (14,637)
Profitability/valuation 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
EBIT (UBS) margin% 7.1 25.8 30.0 35.0 38.0 39.5 41.0 43.0
ROIC (EBIT)% 5.4 73.0 68.2 123.2 127.5 106.6 142.2 65.4
EV/EBITDA (UBS core) x 53.0 19.0 19.5 26.8 16.2 9.2 7.5 6.3
P/E (UBS, diluted) x 61.1 21.7 23.0 34.0 21.1 12.1 10.0 8.5
Equity FCF (UBS) yield% 1.1 2.4 4.3 1.2 1.8 1.1 18.9 (24.1)
Dividend yield (net)% 1.7 3.4 3.1 2.1 3.3 5.9 7.1 8.3

Source: Company accounts, LSEG Eikon, UBS estimates. Metrics marked as (UBS) have had analyst adjustments applied. Valuations: based on an average share price that year, (E): based on a share price of NT$ 942.00 on 24-Jul-2026 17:03:47 CST

Equities

Taiwan

Semiconductors

12-month rating

12m price target

Price (24 Jul 2026)

RIC:

6187.TWO

BBG:

6187 TT

Trading data and key metrics

52-wk range NT$1,390.00-314.50
Market cap. NT$91.9b/US$2.84b
Shares o/s 97.5m (ORD)
Free float 77%
Avg. daily volume ('000) 1,182
Avg. daily value (m) NT$1,384.2
Common s/h equity (12/26E) NT$8.16b
P/BV (12/26E) 11.2x
Net debt to EBITDA (12/26E) NM
EPS (UBS, diluted) (NT$) From To %ch Cons.
12/26E - 27.71 - 25.06
12/27E - 44.54 - 41.14
12/28E - 77.9 - 52.01

Sunny Lin

Analyst sunny.lin@ubs.com +886-2-8722 7346

Ryan Sun

Associate Analyst ryan-za.sun@ubs.com +886-2-8722 7267

Christine Chen, CFA

Associate Analyst christine.chen@ubs.com +886-2-8722 7361

Buy

Prior : No Rating

NT$1,550.00

Prior :

NT$942.00

Thesis Map UBS Research THESIS MAP a guide to our thinking and what´s where in this report

Pivotal Questions

UBS VIEW

EVIDENCE

WHAT´S PRICED IN?

Upside/Downside Spectrum

Company Description

Q: Can All Ring sustain sales growth beyond the CoWoS capex cycle?

Yes. We are optimistic about the next capex cycle for advanced packaging, led by SoIC, CoPoS, and CPO in the upcoming years. We believe All Ring will remain a key back-end equipment supplier to major foundries and OSATs, with a rising share and an expanding equipment offering. In the near term, industry CoWoS expansion is set to accelerate across TSMC and ASE in H226-2027E, supported by a larger cloud AI market. Industry CoWoS capacity may reach >250kwpm by end-2027E from 160kwpm at end-2026E. We forecast All Ring's SEMI sales to grow 78% YoY in 2026, mainly supported by CoWoS, then 53% in 2027 and 70% in 2028, backed by a wider portfolio of new technologies, including SoIC, CoPoS, and CPO, on top of CoWoS.

Q: Could All Ring benefit from CPO?

Yes. We think All Ring's robotic arm and software algorithm expertise will position it at the forefront of FAU coupling equipment, critical for CPO adoption. All Ring mainly competes with Sungho from Korea, although we believe All Ring's tools may offer better coupling, with likely greater throughput. Given the cloud AI trend toward higher bandwidth to 3.2T and above, with a tighter power budget, we think CPO may have increasing industry adoption and become a more mainstream interconnect solution for next-generation AI servers in upcoming years (see our CPO deep dive). The technology is still in the early stage of mass production, although we anticipate the supply chain to start building capacity in 2027-28. We forecast All Ring to recognise CPO sales for 100 FAU coupling tools in 2027 and 300 in 2028, with CPO reaching 13%/23% of sales in 2027/2028.

We initiate at Buy and a price target of NT$1,550, implying 65% upside. We are optimistic about the sustained capex cycle of advanced packaging in the next two to three years, underpinned by cloud AI and the emerging CPO opportunity. Industry capex could rise further in 2028-29, driven by CoPoS, SoIC and other technologies in Taiwan, the US and Southeast Asia. New technologies such as CoPoS may lift All Ring's tool ASP >15%, on better capability and throughput. All Ring may expand share in CoPoS through improved execution and TSMC's localization. We forecast All Ring's SEMI sales to grow 78%/53%/70% in 2026/2027/28 and CPO to contribute 13%/23% of sales in 2027/2028.

Accelerated capex guidance by industry leaders such as TSMC and ASE indicates strong equipment demand for advanced packaging in 2026-27. TSMC noted the necessity to narrow the supplydemand gap for CoWoS, with progress in next-generation CoPoS packaging technology. The tech industry is also investing more resources to bring CPO into commercialisation in upcoming years.

After a recent pullback, All Ring is trading at 21x 2027E PE, a discount to advanced packaging peers. We believe the market underestimates new drivers such as CPO, CoPoS and SoIC. Regarding All Ring's positioning in FAU coupling vs. Sungho, we believe All Ring has several competitive advantages, including superior tool and software integration, relationships in the Taiwanese ecosystem leading to CPO development, and high R&D intensity to respond to customer requirements and drive hardware and productivity upgrades.

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_001
Value drivers (2027E/2028E) SEMI sales growth CPO tool shipments GM
NT$1,800 upside 89%/49% 250/350 56%/58%
NT$1,550 base 53%/70% 100/300 53%/54%
NT$500 downside 35%/55% 50/100 50%/51%

Source: UBS estimates

Founded in 1996, All Ring is a leading automation and equipment supplier for the semiconductor back-end packaging and passive component manufacturing industries.

Can All Ring sustain sales growth beyond the CoWoS capex cycle?

Accelerating CoWoS industry expansion into 2027E

Advanced packaging has emerged as the essential technology enabler of highperformance compute chips since 2023, when cloud AI demand took off after the success of ChatGPT. Importantly, 2.5D die-to-die advanced packaging drives high-speed interconnect between accelerator chips and HBMs within the same package and supports a robust performance upgrade for AI chips even with slower Moore's law scaling for the front end. TSMC has been the leading advanced packaging supplier in the space with CoWoS (chip-on-wafer on-substrate) packaging technology and is investing capex continuously to satisfy high demand from AI/HPC applications. We forecast industry CoWoS capacity to continue rising from 90kwpm in 2025 to 160kwpm in 2026, then further to over 250kwpm in 2027, with demand continuing to outpace supply (see our latest CoWoS industry report). ASE and Amkor, the OSATs serving as non-TSMC advanced packaging suppliers, are also benefiting from larger advanced packaging demand and expanding advanced packaging capacity due to supply tightness at TSMC. We estimate packaging-related capex at TSMC, ASE and Amkor will remain high, from an aggregate US$4.7bn in 2023 to US$21.1bn in 2027 (our capex estimates are in Figure 2 R i s n c g a p e x b y T S M C , A E d m k o r f v t ).

All Ring is a key equipment supplier for TSMC's CoWoS. All Ring is the major supplier for lid placement, underfill dispensers and AOI tools for the on-substrate (oS) process of CoWoS . All Ring has benefited from the strong capex cycle of TSMC's CoWoS since 2023. We believe CoWoS orders could be sustained into 2027E, with accelerating expansion across TSMC and ASE.

Figure 1: We forecast industry CoWoS capacity to expand from 90kwpm at end2025 to >250kwpm by 2027

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_002

Source: UBS estimates

Figure 2: Rising capex by TSMC, ASE and Amkor for advanced packaging and testing

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_003

Source: Company data, UBS estimates

Figure 3: CoWoS order visibility to be sustained into 2026-27E - All Ring's sales from CoWoS, amount and as % of total sales

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_004

Source: UBS estimates

TSMC's CoPoS is the next opportunity beyond CoWoS

Beyond the CoWoS investment cycle, we believe TSMC has been aggressively developing next-generation 2.5D packaging technology CoPoS (chip-on-panel-onsubstrate). (For more, see our industry deep dive on CoPoS vs. Intel's EMIB-T.) CoPoS is being developed to satisfy the much larger package size (ie, 9-10x reticle size or larger) that aims to integrate four or more compute accelerators and over ten HBM stacks with more robust compute capability. TSMC's target is to put the technology into mass production in 2028, and it is setting up an R&D mini-line for technology verification. We think CoPoS is likely to drive another wave of equipment investment in 2027E and beyond.

Figure 4: Area utilisation of CoPoS (FO PLP) vs. CoWoS (FO WLP)

Figure 5: CoPoS (FO PLP) can achieve much larger carrier areas vs. CoWoS (FO WLP)

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_005

Source: UBS

Source: UBS

With its strong capability and track record in CoWoS, All Ring is likely to remain a major supplier for CoPoS across its tool sets of lid attach, underfill and AOI for the oS process, with further potential to gain share in underfill for the CoP process. In TSMC's CoWoS, the underfill and relevant AOI tools for CoW are supplied by ASYMTEK in the US, although we believe All Ring, through close collaboration with TSMC, may expand to CoP and gain more content. Even for oS-related equipment, including underfill, AOI and lid placement, we believe CoPoS could drive a 10-15%+ higher tool ASP , given a larger substrate and more complex chip package structures.

For every 1kwpm in CoWoS capacity, we estimate All Ring could drive ~US$5.5m in revenue (or NT$150-160m). We believe CoPoS may provide at least 10-15% upside for the tool ASP , or a US$6.0-6.3m revenue opportunity, with potential upside from a CoP share gain.

Figure 6: All Ring's revenue opportunity per 1 kwpm of CoWoS and CoPoS

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_006

Source: UBS estimates

In addition to TSMC's back-end technologies, much higher industry investment in advanced packaging as a whole, across 2.5D packaging, 3D stacking, CPO and others, may also open up opportunities for All Ring to capture.

Figure 7: All Ring's SEMI sales by CoWoS, CoPoS, SoIC, CPO, and others in 202428E

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_007

Source: UBS estimates

Could All Ring benefit from CPO?

The data center bottleneck has shifted from compute to interconnect. With the rapid leap of compute performance of new AI accelerators, the bandwidth of interconnect has to be upgraded as well, while optimizing power consumption. CPO is set to power tomorrow's AI data centers, when interconnect migrates to 3.2T and above, as the current networking technologies (including traditional pluggable and copper) run out of steam. (See our in-depth report on CPO technology.) Nvidia is leading the industry's technological development, with scale-out (interconnect between racks) CPO switch scheduled to enter mass production in H226 for Rubin racks, with higher volume in 2027. Scale-up (interconnect within a rack) CPO solutions may begin in 2028, with Nvidia's next-generation rack architecture for Rubin Ultra and Feynman looking to integrate CPO with switch trays. Scale-up for XPUs (interconnect directly with XPUs on the compute board) may happen in 2029, based on Nvidia's current roadmap.

All Ring will play a critical role in the CPO supply chain in upcoming years. With its expertise in automation R&D on robotic arms and six-plane algorithms, All Ring will supply FAU coupling tools to OSATs such as ASE and SPIL. The tools will align FAUs with OEs. FAU coupling requires high-precision alignment on three planes (X, Y, and Z), especially at the initial stages of CPO adoption, when active alignment is necessary to grant the least insertion loss. The equipment will couple FAUs with OEs and glue the two components via underfill dispensers, then cure the underfill to solidify the attachment. From purely an oS process perspective, All Ring's FAU coupling equipment may generate a higher revenue opportunity per substrate, given the amount of FAUs that need to be attached to OEs (ie, 32 OEs for Nvidia's Spectrum scale-out switch) and lower throughput than for CoWoS, as the oS process is more mature and simplified.

TSMC

Figure 8: Nvidia's CPO packaging layout and notable suppliers

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_008

Source: UBS

We are constructive on All Ring's industry positioning for FAU coupling and AOI equipment in 2027 and beyond, given its technological capability and close partnerships with TSMC and ASE/SPIL. We believe All Ring may comprise a >50% share in FAU coupling equipment and secure more orders vs. main competitor ADS Tech (a subsidiary of Sungho Electronics) in Korea. We forecast the FAU coupling opportunity to drive revenue of NT$1.8bn in 2027 and NT$5.4bn in 2028 for All Ring, accounting for 13%/23% of total sales, with a steady gross margin profile at least in line with the corporate target of 50-55%.

Figure 9: All Ring's CPO FAU coupling sales forecast

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_009

Source: UBS estimates

We believe All Ring is working on multiple CPO projects, with upside potential from additional tool offerings for other heterogeneous packaging/integration, which may come through in late 2027E or 2028E.

Company background

Founded in 1996 and listed on the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2002, All Ring is a leading automation and equipment supplier for the semiconductor back-end packaging and passive component manufacturing industries. All Ring is highly R&D-focused, with 65% of its employees working in R&D, and it holds over 200+ patents. Headquartered in Kaohsiung, All Ring operates in Taiwan (Kaohsiung, HsinChu, Taichung), the US, Japan, Malaysia and Mainland China. Chairman Lu Ching-Lai, the founder, has led the company since its inception. According to its 2025 annual report, Mr. Lu and his wife currently own 13% of the company's shares.

The company began by manufacturing tools for passive component manufacturing but has expanded into semiconductor back-end packaging through long-established partnerships with global OSAT and foundry customers. All Ring started supplying ASE in 2000 and became involved in Apple's system-in-package (SiP) assembly in 2015. With

the growth of AI, HPC and advanced packaging, semiconductor equipment has become the majority of All Ring's revenue base, accounting for 95% of total revenue in 2024 and 2025, up from 78-79% in 2022-23. On an absolute NTD basis, its SEMI revenue in 2026E may grow ~10x from the 2023 level.

Figure 10: SEMI is now >95% of sales; on an absolute dollar basis, SEMI sales may grow 10x in 2026E from 2023

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_010

Source: Company data, UBS estimates

The company's revenue base is now primarily driven by CoWoS, which represented less than 5% of total revenue before 2023 but grew to 60-70% in 2024 and 90% in 2025. Along with this exponential growth, All Ring's top three customers accounted for 88% of its total revenue in 2024, up from 55% in 2023. We believe the largest customers are likely to be SPIL (mainly for TSMC demand) and ASE.

Key products

Within CoWoS, All Ring supplies tools such as underfill dispensers, AOI, heatsink placement, ball mounters, and flux jetting.

  • ˜ Dispensers: A dispenser is a machine that applies liquid or paste-like materials with high-precision onto a substrate, wafer or another component. All Ring's product portfolio contains dispensers utilizing a variety of methodologies, including piezo, screw pumps, sprays, and syringes.

Figure 11: All Ring's Piezo dispenser for UV adhesive, underfill and other conductive adhesives

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_011

Source: All Ring

  • ˜ Attachment/heterogeneous integration: In advanced packaging, bondingcritical capability is important to ensure high-quality integration between dissimilar materials.
  • ˜ Heatsinks: A heatsink is a passive component that absorbs heat from semiconductor packaging, which is crucial in advanced packaging as density and power intensity rises heat generation increases. The process includes heat spreader/thermal interface material (TIM) placement. All Ring offers thermal packaging process equipment that helps with process stability and yield enhancement.
  • ˜ AOI: An AOI inspection machine detects missing dies and die colour markings through image recognition. All Ring focuses on 2D AOI, providing integrated inspection solutions across various packaging process stages, from in-line inspection to final product verification. For CPO, All Ring offers six-sided visual inspection tools.

Figure 12: Heatsink placement tool

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_012

Source: All Ring

Figure 13: AOI tools

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_013

Source: All Ring

  • ˜ Automation systems: All Ring provides automation solutions from singlemachine integration to full production line design. These systems and solutions connect the entire workflow - dispensing, bonding, inspection, and material handling - to enable optimization, improved efficiency, performance stability and yield improvement.

Beyond CoWoS, All Ring continues to strengthen its capability in heterogeneous material bonding and high-precision process integration, and has been working on new technologies within CPO and panel-level packaging. We believe All Ring could expand its market share as TSMC commercializes CoPoS, and can play a critical role as the industry shifts to CPO. Leveraging its internal engineering expertise, All Ring has developed CPO optical coupling platforms between an FAU and an OE. According to the company, it will be able to supply key production tools within the optical coupling process, including alignment, dispensing, bonding and UV light curing. All Ring has already shipped some tools for customer testing.

  • ˜ CPO-related products:
  • ˜ FAU coupling: Optical coupling technology plays a crucial role in the CPO process by enabling high-precision alignment and stable coupling between optical components. As traditional electrical interconnects face limitations in bandwidth and power consumption, optical coupling is becoming increasingly essential. With All Ring's expertise in a six-axis motion platform, it has developed industry-leading high-precision FAU coupling tools to enable CPO adoption.

Figure 14: Nvidia's CPO packaging layout and notable suppliers

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_014

Source: UBS

Competition

All Ring's competitors are mainly foreign automated equipment manufacturers. Within CoWoS, ASYMTEK (a subsidiary of Nordson) is the main supplier of underfill dispensers for CoW, with All Ring supplying for only the oS part of the advanced packaging

TSMC

process. The dynamic could shift with CoPoS, as we believe All Ring engaged with TSMC early regarding CoPoS development and is likely to be the main supplier for CoP underfill and AOI tools, in addition to CoPoS oS tools.

Within CPO, All Ring competes with ADS Tech (subsidiary of Sungho), a Korean supplier, which is currently the major supplier for FAU coupling tools. However, we believe All Ring can gain market share in 2027 and potentially become the main supplier due to its close relationships with local Taiwanese OSATs and superior FAU coupling throughput for optimal efficiency.

Our forecast

Figure 15: UBS vs. consensus earnings estimates

UBSe UBSe UBSe Consensus Consensus Consensus Difference Difference Difference
(NT$m) 2026E 2027E 2028E 2026F 2027F 2028F 2026E 2027E 2028E
Revenue 9,351 14,194 23,937 8,865 14,693 19,889 5% -3% 20%
- YoY chg (%) 74% 52% 69% 65% 66% 35%
Gross profit 4,899 7,523 12,926 4,709 8,046 11,351 4% -7% 14%
- Gross margin 52.4% 53.0% 54.0% 53.1% 54.8% 57.1%
Operating profit 3,277 5,394 9,455 2,923 5,460 7,893 12% -1% 20%
- Operating margin 35.0% 38.0% 39.5% 33.0% 37.2% 39.7%
Pretax profit 3,355 5,424 9,486 3,063 5,568 8,001 10% -3% 19%
Net profit 2,699 4,339 7,589 2,536 4,538 6,441 6% -4% 18%
- Net margin 28.9% 30.6% 31.7% 28.6% 30.9% 32.4%
Basic EPS (NT$) 28.03 45.06 78.81 26.33 47.13 66.88 6% -4% 18%
- YoY chg (%) 82% 61% 75% 70% 79% 42%

Source: Visible Alpha, UBS estimates

Figure 16: UBS earnings forecast

(NT$m) 2025 Q126 Q226E Q326E Q426E 2026E Q127E Q227E Q327E Q427E 2027E 2028E 2029E 2030E
Revenue 5,366 1,411 2,355 3,039 2,546 9,351 2,497 3,237 4,185 4,275 14,194 23,937 28,031 31,166
- YoY chg (%) -3% 13% 55% 78% 187% 74% 77% 37% 38% 68% 52% 69% 17% 11%
- QoQ chg (%) 59% 67% 29% -16% -2% -65% 68% 32%
Gross profit 2,913 731 1,236 1,596 1,337 4,899 1,323 1,715 2,218 2,266 7,523 12,926 15,417 17,141
- Gross margin 54.3% 51.8% 52.5% 52.5% 52.5% 52.4% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 53.0% 54.0% 55.0% 55.0%
Operating profit 1,611 328 824 1,170 955 3,277 949 1,230 1,590 1,625 5,394 9,455 11,493 13,402
- Operating margin 30.0% 23.2% 35.0% 38.5% 37.5% 35.0% 38.0% 38.0% 38.0% 38.0% 38.0% 39.5% 41.0% 43.0%
Pre-tax profit 1,813 387 832 1,177 960 3,355 956 1,239 1,599 1,630 5,424 9,486 11,523 13,488
Net profit 1,485 325 665 942 768 2,699 765 991 1,279 1,304 4,339 7,589 9,219 10,790
- YoY chg (%) 13% -5% 67% 124% 138% 82% 136% 49% 36% 70% 61% 75% 21% 17%
- QoQ chg (%) 0% 105% 42% -18% 0% -63% 67% 32%
Basic EPS (NT$) 15.42 3.37 6.91 9.78 7.97 28.03 7.94 10.29 13.28 13.54 45.06 78.81 95.73 112.05
- YoY chg (%) 6% -6% 66% 124% 137% 82% 136% 49% 36% 70% 61% 75% 21% 17%
- QoQ chg (%) 0% 105% 42% -18% 0% -63% 67% 32%

Source: Company data, UBS estimates

What´s Priced In?

WHAT´S PRICED IN?

Product category Ticker Company name Market cap (US$m) Share price Stock YTD performance P/E (x) P/E (x) P/E (x) Major equipment offering(s)
Product category Ticker Company name Market cap (US$m) Share price Stock YTD performance 2026E 2027E 2028E Major equipment offering(s)
Die attach 0522.HK ASMPT 8,802 166.5 115.0% 31.7 22.4 18.2 • Die bonder for on-substrate (mass reflow) • Thermo-compression bonder (Chip-to-substrate/Chip-to-wafer) • Hybrid bonder
BESI.AS BE Semiconductor Industries 20,156 229.9 71.9% 53.1 35.1 22.7 • Hybrid bonder • Thermo-compression bonder • Flip chip bonder
042700.KS Hanmi Semiconductor 13,965 216,000.0 69.5% 64.1 40.7 34.1 • Thermo-compression bonder
KLIC.O Kulicke and Soffa 8,144 106.1 132.8% 34.4 27.6 23.5 • Thermo-compression bonder (Chip-to-substrate/Chip-to-wafer) • Ball bonder in InFO
6590.T Shibaura Mechatronics 2,317 5,410.0 42.8% 23.5 18.5 13.1 • Die bonder for chip-on-wafer (mass reflow) • Hybrid bonder
Wet process 3131.TWO Grand Process Technology 2,742 2,865.00 83.7% 36.5 23.2 16.2 • Wet process cleaning tool
Wet process 3583.TW Scientech 1,883 715.00 114.1% 34.6 23.2 17.4 • Wet process cleaning tool • Temporary bonding/debonding system
Underfill 6187.TWO All Ring 3,108 942.00 158.8% 33.6 20.9 12.0 • Underfill dispenser • Automated optical inspection (AOI) tool
Underfill NDSN.O Nordson Corporation 16,706 292.1 21.5% 25.2 23.3 21.6 • Underfill dispenser
Metrology 2360.TW Chroma ATE 28,297 2,080.00 168.4% 49.4 32.7 24.6 • Redistribution layer measurement

Source: Company data, LSEG, UBS estimates. Notes: Taiwan stocks priced as of 24 July 2026; non-Taiwan stocks priced as of 23 July 2026. Share prices in local currency. EPS estimates for non-covered companies (Kulicke and Soffa, Shibaura Mechatronics, Scientech and Nordson Corporation) are based on LSEG consensus forecasts.

After a strong rally earlier in 2026, advanced packaging-related stocks have corrected for the past 3 months, on broader market de-leveraging, investor concerns regarding cloud capex, and a mixed outlook for CPO development. The rally in early 2026 was driven by optimism in advanced packaging capex with ongoing CoWoS expansion, TSMC's accelerated development of CoPoS, and CPO mass production as of H226. Advanced packaging equipment vendors are now trading at an average of 27x 2027E PE.

Figure 18: All Ring's 12-month-forward PE band (x)

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_015

Source: LSEG, UBS estimates

All Ring is trading at NT$942 as of 24 July 2026.

Figure 19: All Ring's vs. Grand Process' (GPTC's) forward PE - we believe there is upside for both

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_016

Source: LSEG, UBS estimates

CoPoS and CPO opportunity not fully priced in yet

After a recent pullback, All Ring is trading at 21x 2027E PE, a discount to advanced packaging peers. We believe the market underestimates the potential of new drivers such as CPO, CoPoS and SoIC. Regarding the debate around All Ring's positioning in FAU coupling vs. Sungho, we believe All Ring has several competitive advantages, including superior tool and software integration, long-lasting relationships in the Taiwanese ecosystem leading to CPO development, and R&D intensity to quickly upgrade tool productivity and specifications to customers' requirements.

Upside/Downside Spectrum

Upside/Downside Spectrum

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_017

Risk to the current share price is skewed (1.9:1) to the upside.

UPSIDE(NT$1,800): Our upside scenario reflects more favourable overall deployment for CPO and CoPoS in the industry, with All Ring gaining majority shares in FAU coupling from ASD Tech and in CoP. This is likely to be a net positive for All Ring's equipment shipments in 2027-28. We assume CPO tool shipments of 250 in 2027 and 350 in 2028, while CoPoS sales could be positive for SEMI sales growth of 89%/49% YoY, reflecting volume deployment from Nvidia and a successful ramp from the supply chain, such as OSAT and testing partners.

BASE(NT$1,550): Our price target of NT$1,550 is based on 25x average 2027-28E PE. We expect an earnings CAGR of 35% in 2027-30E. While CoWoS remains resilient in 2027E, All Ring could gain shares in CPO and CoPoS, driving total SEMI sales growth of 53%/70% YoY in 2027/2028E, with GM of 53%/54%.

DOWNSIDE (NT$500): Our downside scenario reflects a slower-than-expected CPO ramp and slower-than-expected adoption of CoPoS. Slower scale-out CPO adoption due to supply chain challenges could meaningfully push the timeline outward, with smaller equipment shipments of 50 in 2027E and 100 in 2028E compared with our base case of 100 and 300. CoPoS adoption later than in 2028E may also challenge All Ring's sales growth in 2027-28E, with a lower ASP from premium CoP equipment, resulting in a weaker GM of 50%/51% in 2027/2028E.

All Ring is trading at NT $942 as of 24 July 2026

Company Description

Company Description

Founded in 1996, All Ring is a Taiwan-based supplier of automation equipment for the semiconductor back-end packaging and passive component manufacturing industries. The company's products include underfill dispensers, heatsink placement and automated optical inspection (AOI) tools for advanced packaging equipment, particularly for heterogeneous integration. Revenue is generated primarily from sales of semiconductor and electronic manufacturing equipment and related automation solutions, with more than 90% of revenue derived from Taiwan.

Industry Outlook

We are optimistic about the sustained capex cycle of advanced packaging in the next two to three years, backed by cloud AI demand and the emerging CPO opportunity. Advanced packaging plays a critical role in supporting cloud AI chips for greater compute performance and high-speed interconnect between compute and memory at lower power. We believe TSMC and ASE will accelerate CoWoS expansion in 2027. Industry capex may trend up further in 2028-29E, driven by CoPoS, SoIC and other technologies, with expansion in Taiwan, the US and Southeast Asia. CPO is a new optical interconnect solution with high bandwidth and reasonable power consumption for next-generation AI servers. As of now, CPO is still in the early stage of development, although we anticipate increasing adoption for interconnect between server racks and inside of servers in the next three to five years.

Revenue mix by segment (2023-27E)

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_018

Source: Company data, UBS estimates

Revenue mix by technology (2027E)

報告_UBS_萬潤6187_20260727_019

Source: UBS estimates

All Ring Tech (6187.TWO)

Income Statement (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E %ch 12/27E %ch 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Revenues 1,205 5,535 5,366 9,351 74.3 14,194 51.8 23,937 28,031 31,166
Gross profit 624 2,717 2,913 4,899 68.2 7,523 53.6 12,926 15,417 17,141
EBITDA (UBS) 137 1,483 1,679 3,383 101.5 5,591 65.3 9,841 12,112 14,291
Depreciation & amortisation (51) (56) (69) (107) -55.5 (198) -85.5 (386) (619) (889)
EBIT (UBS) 85 1,427 1,611 3,277 103.4 5,394 64.6 9,455 11,493 13,402
Associates & investment income 0 0 (1) 0 - 0 - 0 0 0
Other non-operating income 65 116 166 52 -68.5 0 - 0 0 0
Net interest 10 22 37 26 -28.6 30 13.1 31 31 87
Exceptionals (incl goodwill) 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0
Pre-tax profit 161 1,566 1,813 3,355 85.1 5,424 61.6 9,486 11,523 13,488
Tax (23) (255) (316) (661) -108.8 (1,085) -64.1 (1,897) (2,305) (2,698)
Profit after tax 138 1,311 1,496 2,694 80.1 4,339 61.0 7,589 9,219 10,790
Preference dividends 0 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0
Minorities 0 0 (11) 5 - 0 - 0 0 0
Extraordinary items 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0
Net earnings (local GAAP) 138 1,311 0 1,485 2,699 81.7 4,339 60.8 7,589 9,219 10,790
Net earnings (UBS) 138 1,311 1,485 2,699 81.7 4,339 60.8
Tax rate (%) 7,589 9,219 10,790
14.1 16.3 17.5 19.7 12.8 20.0 1.5 20.0 20.0 20.0
Per Share (NT$) EPS (UBS, diluted) 12/23 1.59 12/24 14.57 12/25 15.26 12/26E 27.71 %ch 81.6 12/27E 44.54 %ch 60.8 12/28E 77.90 12/29E 94.63 12/30E 110.77
EPS (local GAAP, diluted) 1.59 14.57 15.26 27.71 81.6 44.54 60.8 77.90 94.63 110.77
EPS (UBS, basic) 1.70 14.57 15.42 28.03 45.06 60.8 78.81 112.05
DPS (net) (NT$) 1.61 10.80 19.62 81.7 31.54 55.16 95.73
Cash EPS (UBS, diluted) 1 2.19 10.90 15.19 15.96 28.80 81.7 80.4 46.57 60.8 61.7 81.87 67.01 100.99 78.43 119.90
Book value per share 29.78 67.26 75.34 84.23 11.8 109.52 30.0 156.50 196.82 241.59
Average shares (diluted) 87 90 97 97 0.1 97 0.0 97 97
Balance Sheet (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E %ch 12/27E %ch 97 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Cash and equivalents 1,140 3,599 4,297 5,342 24.3 6,103 14.2 5,063 18,140 (9,494)
Other current assets 1,677 2,731 2,038 4,797 135.4 7,890 64.5 16,498 971 52,368
Total current assets Net tangible fixed assets 2,817 925 6,330 1,298 6,335 10,139 60.0 13,992 38.0 21,561 19,112 5,666 42,874 6,958
1,879 2,238 19.1 3,033 0 35.6 - 4,323
Net intangible fixed assets 0 0 0 0 - 1,573 0 0 0
Investments / other assets 746 1,168 1,396 1,573 12.7 0.0 1,573 1,573 1,573
Total assets 4,488 8,796 9,609 13,949 45.2 18,599 33.3 27,457 26,350 51,405
Trade payables & other ST liabilities 1,076 1,858 1,640 4,328 163.8 5,528 27.7 8,834 2,821 22,538
Short term debt Total current liabilities 0 1,076 0 1,858 0 1,640 0 4,328 - 163.8 0 5,528 - 27.7 0 8,834 0 2,821 0 22,538
Long term debt 853 290 350 1,144 226.7 2,144 87.4 3,144 4,144 5,144
Other long term liabilities 78 131 131 133 1.4 133 0.0 133 133 133
Preferred shares 0 0 0 - 0 - 0 0 0
Total liabilities (incl pref shares) 2,007 0 2,279 2,121 5,604 164.2 7,804 39.3 12,110 7,097 27,815
Common s/h equity Minority interests 0 0 189 185 -2.4 185 0.0 185 185 23,405
2,481 6,517 7,299 8,160 11.8 10,610 30.0 15,162 19,068 185
Total liabilities & equity 4,488 8,796 9,609 13,949 45.2 18,599 33.3 27,457 26,350 51,405
Cash Flow (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E %ch 12/27E %ch 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Net income (before pref divs) 138 1,311 1,485 2,699 81.7 4,339 60.8 7,589 9,219 10,790
Depreciation & amortisation Net change in working capital 51 56 (301) 69 255 107 55.5 198 (1,893) 85.5 -41.6 386 (5,302) 619 9,514 889
Other operating 29 (10) 14 149 (1,337) 71 - -52.7 0 - 0 0 (31,679) 0
Operating cash 210 1,079 1,958 1,540 -21.4 2,643 71.7 2,673 19,352 (19,999)
flow Tangible capital (124) (373) (512) 0 8.6 (994) -112.5 (1,676) (1,962) (2,182)
expenditure (468) 0 - 0 0
Intangible capital expenditure 0 0 - 0 0
Net (acquisitions) & disposals (288) 55 (49) (37) 24.2 0 0 - - 0 0 0 0 0
Other investing Investing cash flow 6 (41) (106) (9) 91.3 22.9 0
(406) (359) (666) (514) (994) -93.5 (1,676) (1,962) (2,182)
Equity dividends paid (250) 0 (131) 1,394 (980) 0 (1,040) -6.1 (1,889) -81.7 - (3,037) 0 (5,312) 0 (6,453) 0
Share issues / (buybacks) - -
Other financing 26 (6) 192 0 (2) - 0 0 0 0 0
Change in debt & pref shares (33) 593 142 998 NM 1,000 0.2 1,000 1,000 1,000
Financing cash flow Cash flow inc/(dec) in cash (257) 1,851 (645) (43) 93.3 (889) 761 NM -22.6 (2,037) (1,040) (4,312) 13,077 (5,453)
(453) 2,571 647 983 52.0 20.9 0 - 0 0 (27,634) 0
FX / non cash items Balance sheet inc/(dec) in cash 156 (112) 51 698 62 1,045 761 -27.2 (1,040) (27,634)
(297) 2,459 49.7 13,077

Source: Company accounts, UBS estimates. (UBS) metrics use reported figures which have been adjusted by UBS analysts. 1 Cash EPS (UBS, diluted) is calculated using UBS net income adding back depreciation and amortization.

All Ring Tech (6187.TWO)

Valuation (x) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
P/E (local GAAP, diluted) 61.1 21.7 23.0 34.0 21.1 12.1 10.0 8.5
P/E (UBS, diluted) 61.1 21.7 23.0 34.0 21.1 12.1 10.0 8.5
P/CEPS 41.6 20.8 21.7 32.3 20.0 11.4 9.2 7.8
Equity FCF (UBS) yield% 1.1 2.4 4.3 1.2 1.8 1.1 18.9 (24.1)
Dividend yield (net)% 1.7 3.4 3.1 2.1 3.3 5.9 7.1 8.3
P/BV 3.3 4.7 4.7 11.2 8.6 6.0 4.8 3.9
EV/revenues (core) 6.0 5.1 6.1 9.7 6.4 3.8 3.2 2.9
EV/EBITDA (UBS core) 53.0 19.0 19.5 26.8 16.2 9.2 7.5 6.3
EV/EBIT (core) 84.9 19.7 20.4 27.6 16.8 9.6 7.9 6.8
EV/OpFCF (core) 84.9 19.7 20.4 27.6 16.8 9.6 7.9 6.8
EV/op. invested capital 4.6 14.4 13.9 34.0 21.4 10.2 11.2 4.4
Enterprise value (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Market cap. 8,112 29,327 34,019 91,864 91,864 91,864 91,864 91,864
Net debt (cash) (280) (280) (280) (280) (280) (280) (280) (280)
Buy out of minorities 0 0 189 185 185 185 185 185
Pension provisions/other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total enterprise value 7,832 29,046 33,928 91,768 91,768 91,768 91,768 91,768
Non core assets (575) (917) (1,106) (1,262) (1,262) (1,262) (1,262) (1,262)
Core enterprise value 7,257 28,129 32,822 90,506 90,506 90,506 90,506 90,506
Growth (%) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Revenue (46.4) NM (3.0) 74.3 51.8 68.6 17.1 11.2
EBITDA (UBS) (73.4) NM 13.2 101.5 65.3 76.0 23.1 18.0
EBIT (UBS) (81.6) NM 12.9 103.4 64.6 75.3 21.6 16.6
EPS (UBS, diluted) (72.3) NM 4.7 81.6 60.8 74.9 21.5 17.1
Net DPS (47.7) NM (0.9) 81.7 60.8 74.9 21.5 17.1
Margins & Profitability (%) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Gross profit margin 51.8 49.1 54.3 52.4 53.0 54.0 55.0 55.0
EBITDA margin 11.4 26.8 31.3 36.2 39.4 41.1 43.2 45.9
EBIT (UBS) margin 7.1 25.8 30.0 35.0 38.0 39.5 41.0 43.0
Net earnings (UBS) margin 11.5 23.7 27.7 28.9 30.6 31.7 32.9 34.6
ROIC (EBIT) 5.4 73.0 68.2 NM NM NM NM 65.4
ROIC post tax 4.7 61.1 56.3 NM NM NM NM 52.4
ROE (UBS) 5.6 29.1 21.5 34.9 46.2 58.9 53.9 50.8
Capital structure & Coverage (x) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Net debt / EBITDA (2.1) (2.2) (2.4) (1.2) (0.7) (0.2) (1.2) 1.0
Net debt / total equity% (11.6) (50.8) (52.7) (50.3) (36.7) (12.5) (72.7) 62.0
Net debt / (net debt + total equity)% (13.1) NM NM NM (57.9) (14.3) NM 38.3
Net debt/EV% (5.4) (6.2) (10.7) (4.4) (4.4) (3.2) (8.7) 0.3
Capex / depreciation% NM NM NM NM NM NM NM NM
Capex / revenue% 10.3 6.7 9.5 5.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0
EBIT / net interest - - - - - - - -
Dividend cover (UBS) 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4 1.4
Div. payout ratio (UBS)% 94.4 74.8 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0 70.0
Revenues by division (NT$m) 12/23 12/24 12/25 12/26E 12/27E 12/28E 12/29E 12/30E
Others 1,205 5,535 5,366 9,351 14,194 23,937 28,031 31,166
Total 1,205 5,535 5,366 9,351 14,194 23,937 28,031 31,166
EBIT (UBS) by division (NT$m) 12/24 12/25 12/27E 12/28E 12/30E
12/23 1,611 12/26E 12/29E 13,402
Others 85 1,427 3,277 5,394 9,455 11,493
Total 85 1,427 1,611 3,277 5,394 9,455 11,493 13,402

Source: Company accounts, UBS estimates. (UBS) metrics use reported figures which have been adjusted by UBS analysts.

Forecast returns

Forecast price appreciation 64.5%
Forecast dividend yield 2.1%
Forecast stock return 66.6%
Market return assumption 6.3%
Forecast excess return 60.3%

Company Description

Founded in 1996, All Ring is a Taiwan-based supplier of automation equipment for the semiconductor back-end packaging and passive component manufacturing industries. The company's products include underfill dispensers, heatsink placement and automated optical inspection (AOI) tools for advanced packaging equipment, particularly for heterogeneous integration. Revenue is generated primarily from sales of semiconductor and electronic manufacturing equipment and related automation solutions, with more than 90% of revenue derived from Taiwan.

Valuation Method and Risk Statement

We value All Ring based on PE methodology.

Risks for the semis industry:

  • Geopolitical uncertainties: Geopolitical uncertainties including tariffs and more export control could negatively impact semis cycle, and a downturn would lead to slower demand in the overall market and moderating capacity expansion.
  • Meaningful deceleration of new technology development: Slower demand and less investment are expected If there is meaningful deceleration of new technology development such as Cloud AI, autonomous driving, etc.
  • Rising utility cost: Larger-than-expected utility cost increases would further pressure profitability. Rising utility costs in Taiwan have negatively impacted margins for Taiwan tech companies.

Company risks:

  • Faster- or slower-than-expected CoWoS capacity expansion: This could result in All Ring gaining/losing equipment orders from major foundries and OSATs.
  • Competitors achieving technological advancement: Potential risk of competition (from either local or foreign companies) achieving technological advancements could result in All Ring losing market share from major foundries and OSATs.
  • Better- or worse-than-expected AI growth: Better- or worse-than-expected AI growth could lead to a ramp-up or a slowdown of equipment orders from major foundries and OSATs to All Ring, affecting long-term revenue growth potential.
  • Slowdown or delay of new technological advancement: A potential slowdown or delay of the rollout for technological advancements for technologies such as SoIC, CoPoS, and CPO, would limit future equipment orders.
  • Increase of raw material costs: Rising raw material costs may directly impact All Ring's margins for equipment shipments.

Grand Process Technology:

We value GPTC based on PE methodology.

Downside risks include: 1) slower-than-expected CoWoS capacity expansion; 2) competitors achieving technological advancement; 3) geopolitical uncertainty; and 4) worse-thanexpected AI growth.

Quantitative Research Review

UBS Global Research publishes a quantitative assessment of its analysts' responses to certain questions about the likelihood of an occurrence of a number of short term factors in a product known as the 'Quantitative Research Review'. The views for this month can be found below. Views contained in this assessment on a particular stock reflect only the views on those short term factors which are a different timeframe to the 12-month timeframe reflected in any equity rating set out in this note. For previous responses please make reference to (i) previous UBS Global Research reports; and (ii) where no applicable research report was published that month, the Quantitative Research Review which can be found at https://neo.ubs.com/quantitative, or contact your UBS sales representative for access to the report or the Quantitative Research Team on ubs-quant-answers@ubs.com. A consolidated report which contains all responses is also available and again you should contact your UBS sales representative for details and pricing or the Quantitative Research Team on the email above.

All Ring Tech

Question Response
1. Is the industry structure facing the firm likely to improve or deteriorate over the next six months? Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = getting worse, 3 = no change, 5 = getting better, N/A = no view) 4
2. Is the regulatory/government environment facing the firm likely to improve or deteriorate over the next six months? Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = getting tougher 3 = no change, 5 = getting better, N/A = no view) 3
3. Over the last 3-6 months in broad terms have things been improving/no change/getting worse for this stock? Rate on a scale of 1-5 (1 = getting a lot worse, 3 = not much change, 5 = getting a lot better, N/A = no view) 4
4. Relative to the current CONSENSUS EPS forecast, is the next company EPS update likely to lead to: (1 = negative surprise vs consensus, 3 = in-line with consensus, 5 = positive surprise vs consensus expectations, N/A = no view) 3
5. What's driving the difference?
6. Relative to YOUR current earnings forecast, is there relatively greater risk at the next earnings result of:(1 = downside skew risk to earnings, 3 = equal upside or downside risk to earnings, 5 = upside skew risk to earnings, N/A = no view) 3
7. What's driving the difference?
8. Is there an upcoming catalyst for the company over the next three months?
9. Is there an actual or approximate date for the catalyst?
10. Is the catalyst date an actual or approximate date?
11. What is the catalyst?

Required Disclosures

This document has been prepared by UBS Securities Pte. Ltd., Taipei Branch, an affiliate of UBS AG. UBS AG, its subsidiaries, branches and affiliates, including former Credit Suisse AG and its subsidiaries, branches and affiliates are referred to herein as "UBS".

For information on the ways in which UBS manages conflicts and maintains independence of its UBS Global Research product; historical performance information; certain additional disclosures concerning UBS Global Research recommendations; and terms and conditions for certain third party data used in research report, please visit https://www.ubs.com/disclosures. Unless otherwise indicated, information and data in this report are based on company disclosures including but not limited to annual, interim, quarterly reports and other company announcements. The figures contained in performance charts refer to the past; past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. Additional information will be made available upon request. UBS Securities Co. Limited is licensed to conduct securities investment consultancy businesses by the China Securities Regulatory Commission. UBS acts or may act as principal in the debt securities (or in related derivatives) that may be the subject of this report. This recommendation was finalized on: 24 July 2026 09:34 AM GMT. UBS has designated certain UBS Global Research department members as Derivatives Research Analysts where those department members publish research principally on the analysis of the price or market for a derivative, and provide information reasonably sufficient upon which to base a decision to enter into a derivatives transaction. Where Derivatives Research Analysts coauthor research reports with Equity Research Analysts or Economists, the Derivatives Research Analyst is responsible for the derivatives investment views, forecasts, and/or recommendations. Quantitative Research Review: UBS Global Research publishes a quantitative assessment of its analysts' responses to certain questions about the likelihood of an occurrence of a number of short term factors in a product known as the 'Quantitative Research Review'. Views contained in this assessment on a particular stock reflect only the views on those short term factors which are a different timeframe to the 12-month timeframe reflected in any equity rating set out in this note. For the latest responses, please see the Quantitative Research Review Addendum at the back of this report, where applicable. For previous responses please make reference to (i) previous UBS Global Research reports; and (ii) where no applicable research report was published that month, the Quantitative Research Review which can be found at https://neo.ubs.com/ quantitative, or contact your UBS sales representative for access to the report or the Quantitative Research Team on ubs-quantanswers@ubs.com. A consolidated report which contains all responses is also available and again you should contact your UBS sales representative for details and pricing or the Quantitative Research team on the email above.