PDF 原檔：報告_OCP2026_Denvr_Murata_浸沒式整合方案_20261015_original.pdf
講者公開簡報（OCP 官方 Recorded Content 頁提供下載）。文字以 PyMuPDF 逐頁抽取，
### p<n>為頁碼；圖表內容見原檔。
圖片清單（已驗證 2026-10-15）
| 檔名 | 頁 | 分類 | 親眼所見內容 |
|---|---|---|---|
報告_OCP2026_Denvr_Murata_浸沒式整合方案_20261015_p3.png |
p3 | 真資料圖 | TCO 工具 v1.31：目的／進展／下一步，右側為各情境（R0–R6，DC1 vs DC2）損益兩平收入每 kWh 長條圖（約 0.31–0.40 €/kWh 軸） |
報告_OCP2026_Denvr_Murata_浸沒式整合方案_20261015_p5.png |
p5 | 真資料圖 | 電力分配工作組：新發布 ORv3 浸沒基礎規格（電源櫃、PSU、匯流排、連接器、槽體介面），右側為設施→匯流排→列→機櫃→電源櫃→負載的 800V DC 停點示意 |
原始內容
p1
OCP Immersion Solutions: Integrating Cooling, Power, Hardware, and Economics Cooling Environments Immersion Project Requirements Power Distribution Total Cost of Ownership Hardware Mgmt FMEA Amy Short, PhD Denvr Dataworks Kevin Gero Murata Andy Young, PhD Asperitas Oriol Chavanel Hypertec Mick Jones Vertiv Nick Beardsley GRC Edi Roytman Marvell Khaled Morsy BVPI Peter Cooper, PhD Promersion
p2
Five Workstreams – One Deployment Challenge Building the technical, operational and economic foundation for imemrsion at scale Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Economics Confident investment decisions Hardware Management Operations Simpler, more reliable operations Power Distribution Infrastructure Power architectures for higher density Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA) Safety Safer, more resilient deployments Immersion Requirements Foundation Performant, interoperable ecosystem
p3
Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Download the TCO Tool V1.31 Quantifying the economics of advanced cooling PURPOSE Turn technical choices into economic insight • Compare cooling and deployment architectures • Quantify costs, losses and overheads • Identify tradeoffs and break-even points PROGRESS TCO v1.31 Update Expands the Toolkit • More configurable, top-down model • Expanded cooling library • Break-even hosting rate and overhead/loss visibility NEXT STEPS Broaden the model for next-gen infrastructure • Add DC power architectures • Expand industry-sourced equipment data • Grow cross-workstream integration and user guidance
p4
Join the Community Hardware Management PURPOSE Create a common management framework • Standardize monitoring and control • Connect IT and cooling infrastructure • Enable interoperability across vendors and equipment types PROGRESS Building the foundation for interoperability • Liquid Cooling Baseline Profile established • CDU mockup + Interop Profile complete • Immersion mockup + profiles advancing • Agentic AI helper proof-of-concept complete NEXT STEPS Expand the model for next-gen infrastructure • Validate and iterate immersion profiles • Extend to hybrid and enclosed systems • Expand equipment and redundancy profiles Enabling interoperable cooling infrastructure
p5
Power Distribution Enabling power architectures for the next generation 2 3 4 5 PURPOSE Enable safe, efficient & scalable power delivery • Support high-density compute in immersion • Define consistent design and deployment guidance PROGRESS NEW Base Spec Published! • Practical guidance for ORv3 designs for immersion systems • Scope – Power shelves, PSUs, busbars, connectors & tank interface NEXT STEPS Explore higher-power next-gen architectures • Will the servers keep to use the 50V standard or will they jump to accept a DC 800V input? • Power Capacitor Shelf / Capacitor Bank Unit and AC Smoothing Access the Base Spec Join the Community
p6
Join the Community Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA) Lower viscosity Fluid Improved Performance Reduced flash point PURPOSE Understand risk at the system level • Identify credible failure modes • Trace pathways and consequences • Evaluate safeguards and mitigations PROGRESS Building an Evidence-Based Risk Model • System boundaries and scoring defined • Bottom-up failure analysis reviewed • Ignition FMEA + Fault Tree being integrated NEXT STEPS Translate analysis into recommendations • Map critical fault pathways and identify layered safeguards • Harmonize findings into mitigation guidance • Publish whitepaper focused on ignition risk Assessing risk and recommending safeguards
p7
Immersion Requirements Join the Community Marketplace Onboarding Common expectations for safe, interoperable and deployable products 2 3 4 5 PURPOSE Create a common baseline • Safe and fit-for-use products • Comparable expectations across the ecosystem • Enable path to OCP Marketplace PROGRESS Requirements v2.1 is evolving • Fluid-type definitions complete • Collaboration with Fluid Specification to update disclosure req. • Equipment & facility safeguards are the current focus NEXT STEPS Move from requirements to adoption • Advance disclosures, safeguards and codes alignment • Broaden tank, system and monitoring expertise
p8
Amy Short, PhD Denvr Dataworks Kevin Gero Murata Oriol Chavanel Hypertec Immersion Requirements Hardware Management Failure Mode & Effect Analysis (FMEA) Total Cost of Ownership Modeling (TCO) Power Distribution Mick Jones Vertiv Andy Young, PhD Aspiritas Eduard Roytman Marvell Join OCP Solutions today! Chair: Amy Short (amy.short@ocproject.net) Co-Chairs: Andy Young and Kevin Gero Nick Beardsley GRC Khaled Morsy BVPI Peter Cooper, PhD Promersion
p9
Thank You!
p10
Access the Base Spec Power Distribution Join the Community 1. Will the servers keep to use the 50V standard or will they jump to accept a DC 800V input? a. Present i. First Stage → AC - 15-35kV AC to 480V AC (SST - Solid State Transformer) ii. Second Stage → AC – 3-Phase 480V coming inside the DataCenter [WYE vs DELTA] through (BUSWAY) iii. Third Stage → DC – 50V through (POWERSHELF PSUs). iv. Fourth Stage → DC – 50V or 800V? (Server) – *Infineon seems doing it. a. Future i. First Stage → 15-35kV AC to 800V DC (SST – Solid State Transformer) ii. Second Stage à 800V DC (Server) 1. Power Capacitor Shelf / Capacitor Bank Unit and AC Smoothing a. Is it necessary below 150kW? b. Is there any way we can cool it down with liquid cooling? Enabling power architectures for the next generation